To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<34A28291 DOT 9DFCC46C AT a DOT crl DOT com>
Message-Id:	<ADjUkeqeB3@belous.munic.msk.su>
From:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date:	Fri, 26 Dec 1997 02:09:33 +0300 (MSK)
Organization:	Locus
Reply-To:	ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject:	Re: Kernel status (was interesting phenomenon and Super Improved
	Freedos?)
Lines:	19
MIME-Version:	1.0

X-Comment-To: Weiqi Gao

Hi!

25-δΕΛ-97 09:58 weiqigao AT a DOT crl DOT com (Weiqi Gao) wrote to opendos AT delorie DOT com:
 > Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
 > > 25-δΕΛ-97 01:11 ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru (-= ArkanoiD =-) wrote to ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su:

 > >  > => command.com's ugly language like 4DOS), although often NDOS cover my
 > >  > => requirements.
 > Isn't NDOS a licensed version of 4DOS.

     Hm. AFAIK, NDOS _is_ licensed version of old 4DOS.

 > I used 4DOS for a long time.  It
 > gets the job done.  It's drawback - not free.  You cannot consider using
 > it, say, on 500 desktops.

     Yes. :(

- Raw text -