To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<AAUYOeqyV7 AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Message-Id:	<ABEvXeqSfQ@belous.munic.msk.su>
From:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date:	Thu, 25 Dec 1997 11:50:22 +0300 (MSK)
Organization:	Locus
Reply-To:	ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject:	Re: Kernel status (was interesting phenomenon and Super Improved
	Freedos?)
Lines:	21
MIME-Version:	1.0

X-Comment-To: -= ArkanoiD =-

Hi!

25-δΕΛ-97 01:11 ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru (-= ArkanoiD =-) wrote to ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su:

 > =>      I don't consider there shell interpreters (_I_ don't know good DOS
 > => implementation, if not count horrible sets of compromises above
 > => command.com's ugly language like 4DOS), although often NDOS cover my
 > => requirements.

     I forget mention - I hear about awk implementation, but not see.

 > bash (although it is 32-bit only)
 > ms_sh
 > Polytron Shell

     REXX? Java? Perl? a'la BASIC _scripts_ shells? Requirements (XT
compatability, memory requirements, size of shells)?

P.S. Can you repeat ln source repost?

- Raw text -