To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<s481f30f DOT 084 AT calderauk DOT com>
Message-Id:	<ADLDhWquyF@belous.munic.msk.su>
From:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date:	Mon, 1 Dec 1997 15:53:41 +0300 (MSK)
Organization:	Locus
Reply-To:	ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject:	Re: OpenDOS 7.02b2 bugs
Lines:	78
MIME-Version:	1.0

X-Comment-To: Matthias Paul

Hi!

30-ξΟΡ-97 23:12 MPaul AT calderauk DOT com (Matthias Paul) wrote to opendos AT delorie DOT com:
 > From: Matthias Paul <MPaul AT calderauk DOT com>
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
     Well, as I see, you now working for and from Caldera. ;)

 > On 97-11-30  Arkady V.Belousov replied:

 > >    No. You assume compatability between "comp" from OS/2 and from >OpenDOS, although this contrary docs and practice.
 > ;-) Wouldn t be so bad, though?

     May be. ;)

 > As far as I know, COMP errorlevels are
 > not documented at all, so noone can rely on them.

     And what? _If_ COMP are suitable for batches, they _must_ return _some_
errorlevel >0 when files differs (not only when compare set are empty).
_Like_ OS/2's COMP (although not not necessarily 5).

 > However, COD tries to stay as compatible as possible to MS-DOS,

     And _what_ gives _such_ "compatability"? Nothing! Who relies on missing
errorlevel of MS-DOS's COMP and how this relies can be done?

 > so I assume, these obviously
 > not very useful errorlevels are a duplication of what MS-DOS does (if not,
 > please tell me, since personally I have not tested MS-DOS COMP in this
 > respect).

     I not know precisely, but which errorlevels (and compatabily, of
course!) can be used, when MS-DOS's COMP gives ask at the end? :( This bring
me to make extra wrap-around cmp.bat for MS-DOS's COMP:

______________O\_/_________________________________\_/O______________
@echo off
if %2.==. goto curr
echo n|comp %1 %2
goto end

:curr
echo n|comp %1 .

:end
_____________________________________________________________________
              O/~\                                 /~\O

 > >     No. I mean not troubles with manipulating "errorlevel" (this is not
 > >troubles _for me_). I point: "comp" from OD (also as from MS-/PC-DOS) quite
 > >not report presence of differences through errorlevel, so _you_ (also) can't
 > >check this in batches.
 > Exactly. ;-)

     :( I think, this is not bug, but definitely lack of functionality.

 > Discussing COMP, I just thought it might be interesting to some listeners
 > when giving some (more or less related) background info (in this case the errorlevel). That s why I m sometimes a little bit off topic...

     BTW, why _some_ lines of your messages are continues far away 70-80
position? And, if you gives "backround info", you must specifically point
this, like below. ;)

 > [In general]
 > BTW, another totally off-topic issue to all listeners:

[...]
 > from all the mail headers, so that I don t reply to myself). And - if you want to
 > report problems with OpenDOS to Caldera, why not using Caldera s offical
 > address for this purpose:
 > <dosbeta AT calderauk DOT com>
 > with as much information you can give to reproduce the problem. Thanks.

     I duplicate my bug- and wish- list for this address also. Of course.

P.S. This is true - NWCACHE not cache CDs?

- Raw text -