To:	ralsina AT unl DOT edu DOT ar
Cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970922113344 DOT 168J-100000 AT ultra7 DOT unl DOT edu DOT ar>
Message-Id:	<AFQzf9q8a4@belous.munic.msk.su>
From:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date:	Mon, 22 Sep 1997 20:39:54 +0400 (MSD)
Organization:	Locus
Reply-To:	ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject:	Re: source code
Lines:	17
MIME-Version:	1.0

X-Comment-To: Roberto Alsina

Hi!

22-óÅÎ-97 11:34 ralsina AT unl DOT edu DOT ar (Roberto Alsina) wrote to opendos AT delorie DOT com:
 > On Mon, 22 Sep 1997, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
 > > 22-˜Š¾-97 10:45 rgawenda AT pobox DOT com (Rafa Gawenda) wrote to "Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>:

 > >  > Perhaps someone could read in your words either that Linux isn't
 > > efficient (do you know some kernel better than that one) or even worse, that
 > > Linus should rewrite it in ASM (-:
 > >      Compare Linux and QNX - by speed and by requirements.
 > I hope you are not suggesting QNX is written in ASM...

     Independently source language QNX works faster (this is true realtime
OS) and requires _very_ small - only some dozens Kb for kernel, and not some
Mb for work without swap. But this is cost very much...

- Raw text -