To:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970917193146 DOT 472B-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Message-Id:	<ABBlA8qijU@belous.munic.msk.su>
From:	"Arkady V.Belousov" <ark AT belous DOT munic DOT msk DOT su>
Date:	Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:19:23 +0400 (MSD)
Organization:	Locus
Reply-To:	ark AT mos DOT ru
Subject:	Re: 7.02?
Lines:	22
MIME-Version:	1.0

X-Comment-To: Mike A. Harris

Hi!

17-óÅÎ-97 19:32 mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca (Mike A. Harris) wrote to ark AT mos DOT ru:
 > On Thu, 18 Sep 1997, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
 > > X-Comment-To: Mike A. Harris
 > > 17-˜Š¾-97 14:59 mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca (Mike A. Harris) wrote to Dean Dancey <dtwo AT sympatico DOT ca>:

 > >  > > curious about, OpenDOS seems to run faster than MS DOS 6.22, but I am
 > >  > > concerned about the extreme noise level from my HD. Is this normal??
 > >  > Yes.  My hard drive is 4 times as loud now too.  It's much faster
                                                              ^^^^
 > >  > though.  Send me a .wav or .au file of yours and I'll tell you if
 > >  > it's too loud.
 > >      What mean "faster" there? Which config, which task?
 > My hard drive.  Main config.  Copying files (task) (in otherwords
 > benchmark with NWCACHE).

     Hm. How "much faster"? What config contents? Which nwcache options?
What machine configuration? SCSI/IDE? Size, model? How much RAM total and
for nwcache? Your last "answer" say nothing (except _some_ about task).

- Raw text -