Date:	Wed, 17 Sep 1997 14:58:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To:	-= ArkanoiD =- <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
cc:	rgawenda AT pobox DOT com, opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: CP/M web site looking for CP/M-86
In-Reply-To:	<AAcq18qiV7@mpak.convey.ru>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970917145705.12102A-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Capslock Computer Consulting
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Wed, 17 Sep 1997, -= ArkanoiD =- wrote:

> > >So.. OpenDOS will _never_  be multitasking OS..
> > >Too bad.
> >
> > It's multitasking on my box...
> 
> _It?_ Or Desqview/taskmgr/anything? Did you compare?
> 
> >
> > >Does anybody know any details?
> > >
> > >..i am starting to think maybe it's better to return to PC DOS 7?
> >
> > Yes, it's better typying "for %%1 in *.* do type %1" (PC /MS DOS) than "type *.*" DR/Novell/Open DOS.
> > This is only one of the one hundred advantages of this "free" DOS.
> 
> I don't care. I never do. I type "cat *" on any of those.

Heheheh.  Me too.  When you install 4DOS and some UNIX utilities
on ANY DOS version, the differences tend to be less important.

Mike A. Harris        |  Homepage:  http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |  Am I online? -  finger or ping capslock.dyn.ml.org
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
Xwindows: Forget '95.  Use a REAL GUI.

- Raw text -