Date:	Tue, 16 Sep 1997 21:57:51 RST
From:	ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru (-= ArkanoiD =-)
Reply-To:	ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru
Message-Id:	<353@mpak.convey.ru>
To:	crough45 AT amc DOT de
Cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: ClosedDOS???
Organization:	International Brownian Movement
Lines:	25
MIME-Version:	1.0

nuqneH,

In message <97Sep15.140615gmt+0100 DOT 11649 AT internet01 DOT amc DOT de> Christopher Croughton writes:

> > ..actually i don't care anymore - i have 4mb hardware chache on my IDE 
> > subsystem and i'm going to add 4 more for scsi..
> 
> I haven't bothered with SCSI.  Why pay twice as much for no noticable
> improvement over EIDE?
> 

a) Not twice,just ~+20%. b) There is _significant_ improvement over EIDE..
It saves CPU cycles - and when it comes to swap.. I have a EIDE linux machine -
it looks terrible being compared with nearly similar SCSI one. I get load 
level ~3 on first one and ~1.1 on second with the same conditions.

..and.. 7 is more than 2 (or 14 is more than 4). 

and SCSI is not just a disk subsystem,it is general purpose peripherial
interface. And it exists beyond PC world.

-- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|

- Raw text -