To:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970909110446 DOT 572B-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Message-Id:	<AATCP5qiV7@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization:	International Brownian Movement
From:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date:	Tue, 9 Sep 97 21:19:09 +0300
Subject:	Re: ClosedDOS???
Lines:	41
MIME-Version:	1.0

nuqneH,

> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 1997 11:12:23 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
> X-Sender: mharris AT capslock DOT com
> To: -= ArkanoiD =- <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
> cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: ClosedDOS???

[dd]

> > > I ask this:  What good is having the kernel sources if one cannot
> > > update the utility set to accomodate new kernel features?
> > >
> > > Could someone please explain this.
> >
> > Drop it away. Completely or nearly so. Use GNU utilities set instead ;).
> > It does look more like _Open_DOS, right?
>
> Well, I've still got a copy of OD, but not installed.  I don't
> plan on using it again unless Caldera's current position changes.
>
> GNU is more appropriately named OpenDOS.  ;o)
> I'm going to instead transfer my "DOS" interests efforts over to
> the tried and true REAL FREE software out there.
>
> FreeDOS
> Linux
> GNU
>
> etc...

Atually i already do use OpenDOS with GNU utilities set and i feel no need
(or nearly so) in original OD ones - except maybe things like share.exe and
so on (even my console driver is vt102,not ansi).

FreeDOS? Too buggy and not so DOS-compatible..
--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|

- Raw text -