Mail Archives: opendos/1997/05/28/21:53:08
>>> Programs developed explicitly for OpenDOS/32 will be much faster,
>>> more capable, and have more features at their disposal.
>>And what will motivate developers to write explicitly for
>>OpenDOS/32?
> Aren't YOU motivated yet? :)
No. I have all the 32-bit software and OS I need using
Windows 95.
> _I_ certainly want to see a flat-memory, PM Dos :)
I'd love to see a 32-bit clean DOS, fully compatible
to the large DOS app base, with lots of 32-bit-clean
DOS software. However, I'd much rather prefer
a 32-bit-clean fully GUI-based DOS-compatible
and Win32-compatible environment. Until somebody
automates Linux far more, I don't think we're going
to see it. Meanwhile, Windows 95 comes sufficiently
close for me to get the things I need to get done done.
NT console apps are 32-bit-DOS enough for me.
Jonathan E. Brickman River City Computing, Inc. (913) 232-6663
http://www.cjnetworks.com/~rivercity brickman AT cjnetworks DOT com
It seems to me that men usually think more about carburetors, and women
think more about doors. I think the world needs really good carburetors...and
really good doors.
- Raw text -