Date:	Sat, 17 May 1997 08:58:36 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
Reply-To:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To:	John Fremlin <dfremlin AT facstaff DOT wisc DOT edu>
cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Filesystems/Wishlist (ext2)
In-Reply-To:	</jQcz8ew4qLU092yn@facstaff.wisc.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970517085423.276A-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Total disorganization.
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Sat, 10 May 1997, John Fremlin wrote:

> "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca> typed:
> [snip, wishlist stuff]
> >
> >> With all the talk of filesystems, I think the best solution would be to
> >> use ext2, with case-sensitivity optional (probably through an environment
> >> variable).
> >
> >Well, then it is settled.  Everyone agrees that ext2 is the best
> >filesystem for OD to adopt.  Lets start coding now!
> >
> >Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
> 
> Everyone? Oh no! I'm nobody!
> 
> I'd just like to say again: I want to be able to use FAT.

And you WILL be able to use FAT.
 
> If ext2 can do this, then I want ext2 as well.

ext2 is not FAT it is ext2.  Perhaps our discussion should be
taken to the developer list so that we don't get "users"
misunderstanding the inner workings of the operating system and
filesystems.

This is our own fault I'm afraid.  I am going to reply to the
developer group for all future messages to avoid having to
explain the technical details to "users".

> However adding
> a more complex filesystem = adding a feature = adding bugs +
> adding to size of OpenDOS.

This is a totally rediculous statement.
 
> (IMHO OpenDOS has enough bugs already, thank you.)

Then don't use it.

> How about two versions, an ext2 version and a FAT version?
> 
> FAT for those who want compatiblity and stability
> ext2 for people who want new features

If you'd have done your homework and read the list archives,
you'd have realized that this is exactly what has been planned
from the beginning.  No one has ever said "lets destroy FAT and
replace it with ext2".  Get your facts straight.

> A LISP programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing.

Isn't that a speech impediment?


Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |                  Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca  <-- Spam proof address

Download OpenDOS, then: CDD C:\^DEL /ZS MSDOS.SYS IO.SYS \DOS\*.*

- Raw text -