To:	ralsina AT ultra7 DOT unl DOT edu DOT ar
Cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 970515170912 DOT 9454G-100000 AT ultra7 DOT unl DOT edu DOT ar>
Message-Id:	<AC2d3VpO-6@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization:	International Brownian Movement
From:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date:	Fri, 16 May 97 13:41:06 +0300
Subject:	Re: X-Windows
Lines:	32
MIME-Version:	1.0

nuqneH,

> Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 17:10:47 -0300 (GMT-0300)
> From: Roberto Alsina <ralsina AT ultra7 DOT unl DOT edu DOT ar>
> To: Dennis Janssen <nessnaj AT worldonline DOT nl>
> cc: OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
> Subject: Re: X-Windows
[dd]
> On Thu, 15 May 1997, Dennis Janssen wrote:
>
> > > And X *is* useful. And X has a free implementation that could be ported
> > > to DOS.
> >
> > On simtelnet in /msdos/xwindows there is a shareware X-Windows.
> >
> > However the one time I tried to install it, it destroyed my bios-settings
> > in CMOS. Nothing that couldn't be fixed, but I was not amused.
>
> Weird, I have used it without problems before...
> It's a port of XFree86 to DOS, an example of what could be done. But to
> have DOS X clients a multitasking API should be developed.
>
> Is the taskmgr API adequate?
>

No. Concurrent DOS multitasking is better!
..and i'd prefer Desqview and Desqview/X to replace taskmgr..

--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|

- Raw text -