Date:	Thu, 15 May 1997 17:10:47 -0300 (GMT-0300)
From:	Roberto Alsina <ralsina AT ultra7 DOT unl DOT edu DOT ar>
To:	Dennis Janssen <nessnaj AT worldonline DOT nl>
cc:	OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: X-Windows
In-Reply-To:	<199705151925.VAA07641@worldonline.nl>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.91.970515170912.9454G-100000@ultra7.unl.edu.ar>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 15 May 1997, Dennis Janssen wrote:

> > And X *is* useful. And X has a free implementation that could be ported 
> > to DOS.
> 
> On simtelnet in /msdos/xwindows there is a shareware X-Windows. 
> 
> However the one time I tried to install it, it destroyed my bios-settings
> in CMOS. Nothing that couldn't be fixed, but I was not amused.

Weird, I have used it without problems before...
It's a port of XFree86 to DOS, an example of what could be done. But to 
have DOS X clients a multitasking API should be developed.

Is the taskmgr API adequate?

>      Dennis!


 ("\''/").__..-''"`-. .         Roberto Alsina
 `9_ 9  )   `-. (    ).`-._.`)  ralsina AT unl DOT edu DOT ar
 (_Y_.)' ._   ) `._`.  " -.-'   Centro de Telematica
  _..`-'_..-_/ /-'_.'           Universidad Nacional del Litoral
(l)-'' ((i).' ((!.'             Santa Fe - Argentina

- Raw text -