Message-Id:	<199705120624.IAA19229@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
From:	"Mark Habersack" <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization:	PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins)
To:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date:	Mon, 12 May 1997 08:25:57 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: BIG suggestion for Opendos Features
Reply-to:	grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<ABphJSpCM7@mpak.convey.ru>

Once upon a time (on  8 May 97 at 5:31) -= ArkanoiD =- said:

> > Let me get that straight. Are you suggesting that we provide two kernels -
> > one 16 and the other 32 bit? That would make things much easier for
> > programmers, and not so easy for users.
> 
> Four,at least. 16 and 32 bit and both single-tasking (dr dos) and
> multitasking (concurrent dos). --- 
Hmm... you say to *that* extent? Well, that would surely make the kernel 
slower. I think it's a good idea - maa
-----------
On promenades where drunks propose to lonely arcade mannequins,
where ceremonies pause at the jewellers shop display feigning
casual silence in strained romantic interludes till they
commit themselves to the muted journey home. And the pool player
rests on another cue. Last night's hero picking up his dues, a
honeymoon gambled on a richochet...

- Raw text -