To:	NukeEmUp AT ThePentagon DOT com
Cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: EXT2 filesystem information
Message-ID:	<19970507.210330.7895.0.chambersb@juno.com>
References:	alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk "~od: re: ext2
From:	chambersb AT juno DOT com (Benjamin D Chambers)
Date:	Wed, 07 May 1997 23:57:31 EDT

On Wed, 7 May 1997 18:52:18 +0000 "David Cantrell"
<david AT diablo DOT eimages DOT co DOT uk> writes:
>I paraphrase:
>  "it pains me to hear unsupported crap like that, most of which 
>comes from people who have never actually USED Win95/NT for a real 
>task.  The Unix FUD engine at work."

I'll be honest:  I have only used Win95 when setting up programs on a
friend's computer.
After an average of 4 hours per app (most of which never ended up
working, unless you count my DOS box), I concluded that Win95 was crap.

(Okay, I usually decided it was crap after the first hour... the point
still holds)

For the average user, UNIX is NOT the way to go - for me it is, but I'm
not the average user.
For the average user, Win95 is not the way to go either - noone should
have to use an OS that horrible.
I think that once a few things are straightened out (DOS _could_ stand to
be a little easier :) OD will be the best OS for the average user.



This message brought to you by the user of a Dvorak Keyboard :)
...Chambers

- Raw text -