Comments:	Authenticated sender is <alaric+abwillms AT sdps DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
From:	"Alaric B. Williams" <alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
To:	JP Morris <b52g AT usa DOT net>
Date:	Tue, 6 May 1997 18:01:38 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: BIG suggestion for Opendos Features
Reply-to:	alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
CC:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<19970505165220.8085.qmail@mx01.netaddress.usa.net>
Message-ID:	<862937885.11744.0@abwillms.demon.co.uk>

> ><DROOL>
> >Native ext2 with symlinks, hardlinks, case sensitivity, self
> >defragmentation, speed, permissions, uid's/gid's, etc...
 
> Don't overwhelm the poor users with too much complexity.
> As for UNIX permissions, either we inhert the unpleasant
> CHMOD with its 3-levels of security that force the user
> to think in octal, or we invent some really twisted abbreviations.
> I thought the trend was to make things friendlier.

I'd agree with JP here. Do we need this kind of access control?

> Personally I'd be happy to stick with RASH.

It's fine for a single user system, IMHO.
 
And what about case sensitivity? NEVER! I like the way NT
does it. Case is preserved for presentation value, but
I don't have to get the case right to name a file properly!


ABW
--
Alaric B. Williams (alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk)

   ---<## OpenDOS FAQ ##>---

Plain HTML: http://www.delorie.com/opendos/faq/
            http://www.deltasoft.com/faq.html

Fancy HTML: http://www.deltasoft.com/faq0000.html

- Raw text -