Resent-Message-Id:	<199705060253 DOT WAA15875 AT delorie DOT com>
Resent-Date:	Mon, 5 May 1997 21:52:32 -0500
Date:	Mon, 5 May 1997 21:52:32 -0500
From:	dfremlin AT facstaff DOT wisc DOT edu (John Fremlin)
To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: A few FS notions
Message-ID:	<Phobz8ew4yYP092yn@facstaff.wisc.edu>
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.BSI.3.96.970505161711.6017B-100000@hoth.amu.edu.pl>
Resent-From:	dfremlin AT facstaff DOT wisc DOT edu (John Fremlin)
Resent-To:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Lines:	37

Mark Habersack <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl> typed:
>On Mon, 5 May 1997, Pierre Phaneuf wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 4 May 1997, Mike A. Harris wrote:
>> 
>> > I give my vote for a case sensitive FS though.  It would make
>> > things much more flexible.
>> 
>> My vote goes to case sensitive too...
>And mine.
>

Mine does not. If you want your Linux filesystem then get Linux.

Linux is as far as I have heard, a wonderful OS. "As far as I
have heard" because I only have 5 MB free on my harddisk and
a "small" Linux version takes 15 MB.

OpenDos was the only alternative, for me, to MS-DOS 6.21 (yes,
the version without DoubleSpace/DriveSpace).

I want an OpenDos that is 100% MS-DOS (v6+) compatible, and beyond
that I'm not going to fuss too much. Any added features are useful
but not *absolutely* necessary.

As long as I can run all my old programs on OpenDos, without
too many hitches (e.g. EMM386 PIC=ON) then a case sensitive
filesystem would be great (but if it took more than 300 Kb I'd
hunt it down and do my best to delete it).

Remember MS-DOS compatiblity.

-- 
John Fremlin (dfremlin AT facstaff DOT wisc DOT edu)
             (fremdh AT essex DOT ac DOT uk)

- Raw text -