Date:	Sun, 4 May 1997 23:00:19 -0400 (EDT)
From:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
Reply-To:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To:	evand AT scn DOT org
cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: A few FS notions
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.OSF.3.95.970501094820.20452B-100000@unicorn.it.wsu.edu>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970504225828.9064B-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Total disorganization.
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 1 May 1997, Evan Dickinson wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Benjamin D Chambers wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> > What I would like to request is:
> > - Node tree (versus FAT)
> > - Case sensitivity
> 
> Not being much of an UNIX user myself, I have to ask:  Why is a case
> sensitive filesystem an advantage?  I get frustrated when *.zip won't
> match SOMETHING.ZIP; I'm sure lots of other DOS users would, too.

REN *.ZIP *.zip

Some users like case sensitivity.  I for one found it difficult
at first, but only for a short period of time.  We type sentences
in mixed case, so why not filenames?  Again, it would be optional
I suppose.

I give my vote for a case sensitive FS though.  It would make
things much more flexible.


Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |                  Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
Email: mharris at blackwidow.saultc.on.ca  <-- Spam proof address

Question: How do you get talkd to work under Linux with a dynamic IP address?

- Raw text -