Message-Id:	<199704281118.NAA24060@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <grendel@[150.254.113.14]>
From:	"Mark Habersack" <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization:	PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins)
To:	alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 1997 13:17:05 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: File Systems (was Re: Usage of directory entries
Reply-to:	grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC:	alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
References:	<199704251241 DOT OAA11859 AT grendel DOT sylaba DOT poznan DOT pl>
In-reply-to:	<862047727.1010381.0@abwillms.demon.co.uk>

Once upon a time (on 26 Apr 97 at 10:45) Alaric B. Williams said:

> > Exactly! But for that we'd have a 'mount' command - after all, is it *so*
> > complicated to type 'mount -t vfat /dev/fd0' ?? 
> 
> Only if absolutely necessary. If we can possibly do without such a UNIXism,
> we should... it'll only cause problems. I have had a hard enough time
> convincing people that they shouldn't copy files by opening them, swapping
> disks, and closing them, let alone explaining that each floppy they use has
> to be mounted and demounted ("But I don't have to do that under MS-DOS...")
Sure you have to! What else is typing "a:"? It's a kind of mounting, isn't 
it? DOS kernel re-reads the drive to check what media has been put in.
==================================================
Stand straight, look me in the eye and say goodbye
Stand straight, we drifted past the point of
  reasons why.
Yesterday starts tommorow, tommorow starts today
And the problems seem to be we're picking up the
  pieces of a ricochet...

- Raw text -