Message-Id:	<199704281117.NAA24043@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <grendel@[150.254.113.14]>
From:	"Mark Habersack" <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization:	PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins)
To:	alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
Date:	Mon, 28 Apr 1997 13:17:05 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Usage of directory entries
Reply-to:	grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC:	OpenDOS Developer Mailing List <opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970427031529 DOT 2823C-100000 AT dilu DOT ml DOT org>
In-reply-to:	<862174556.067706.0@abwillms.demon.co.uk>

Once upon a time (on 27 Apr 97 at 21:59) Alaric B. Williams said:

> On 27 Apr 97 at 3:31, Pierre Phaneuf wrote:
> 
> > Red Hat 4.1 blows both Win 95 and Win NT to smithereens. In every aspects.
> 
> I'd beg to disagree - I gave up on installing Red Hat 4.1 a few days 
> ago after banging my head against the thing for several hours. Purged
> my partition table of it's unwholesome presence. I'm already having a
> long discussion with Mike Harris, a diehard Linux fan (hi, Mike :-)
> about this, so don't clutter the list with another defence of Linux,
> please - private email if you diagree; I'll forward you my discussion
> with Mike if you want - it's long!
Or I can forward you my discussion with Mike about RPM availability - not so 
long, but pretty depressing ;-))

P.S. Don't agree to the forward Alaric offered - it's about 500KB now! ;-)
==================================================
Stand straight, look me in the eye and say goodbye
Stand straight, we drifted past the point of
  reasons why.
Yesterday starts tommorow, tommorow starts today
And the problems seem to be we're picking up the
  pieces of a ricochet...

- Raw text -