Mail Archives: opendos/1997/04/25/19:26:40
Date: | Fri, 25 Apr 1997 19:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
|
From: | Pierre Phaneuf <pp AT gulliver DOT qc DOT ca>
|
To: | opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
|
Subject: | About Life, Loaders and Binary Formats...
|
In-Reply-To: | <199704251241.OAA11862@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
|
Message-ID: | <Pine.LNX.3.95.970425192822.14396E-100000@server.gulliver.qc.ca>
|
MIME-Version: | 1.0
|
On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:
> No problem ;-) But why would Intel bother with ELF (asking just out of
> curiosity). Speaking of ELF - would it be possible to create 16-bit shared
> libraries in that format?
Don't know about why Intel put this in... But I think there is no
practical way that I know of to create 16-bit shared libraries, in
whatever format. And if it *is* possible, I guess it could be done with
ELF...
Pierre Phaneuf
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/CM/E/IT/MU/P/TW d-(--)pu s+:- a--- C++++$ ULC++(++++)$>++++ P+>++
L++$>+++ E>+ W+(-)$ N+ K w---$ M-- PS+ PE+ Y-- PGP- t+ X+ R+>+++ tv
b++(+) DI+(++) D++ G e(+) h(+)>++ r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- Raw text -