Comments:	Authenticated sender is <alaric+abwillms AT sdps DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
From:	"Alaric B. Williams" <alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
To:	opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 1997 20:08:18 +0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Usage of directory entries
Reply-to:	alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk
In-reply-to:	<199704241124.NAA18259@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970423210821 DOT 6868E-100000 AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca>
Message-ID:	<861911960.0525154.0@abwillms.demon.co.uk>

On 24 Apr 97 at 13:21, Mark Habersack wrote:

> > Things like file system checking and defragmentation are things better
> > done while the file system is either unmounted or mounted read-only.

> Exactly - in such a situation the system is in a known state and thus a 
> possibility to damage anything vital is almost eliminated. But the idea with 
> error detection by the file system code is excellent!

Last Wednesday, I visited Barclaycard's development center in Northampton.
Barclaycard is one of the biggest credit card companies in the UK, a division
of Barclays Bank. Anyway, they use a mix of NT and UNIX servers on 
Compaq hardware. The network manager told me that the server not only
defragments itself, it immediately recommends replacement of SIMMs or
hard disks that start to show intermittent errors. I am vindicated :-)


ABW
--
Alaric B. Williams (alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk)

   ---<## OpenDOS FAQ ##>---

Plain HTML: http://www.delorie.com/opendos/faq/
            http://www.deltasoft.com/faq.html

Fancy HTML: http://www.deltasoft.com/faq0000.html

- Raw text -