Message-Id:	<199704241124.NAA18256@grendel.sylaba.poznan.pl>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <grendel@[150.254.113.14]>
From:	"Mark Habersack" <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization:	PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins)
To:	Lorier <lorier AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 1997 13:21:44 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: File system ideas
Reply-to:	grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC:	physmsa AT cantua DOT canterbury DOT ac DOT nz (Mr M S Aitchison),
	alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<m0wKDIB-000FmMC@hn.planet.gen.nz>

Once upon a time (on 24 Apr 97 at 13:25) Lorier said:

> >I've been toying with attributed file system ideas for a few years now.
> >Combining a general attribute system with file system monitors (triggered
> >and monitored events) you could do some fairly interesting things.  I'd be
> >willing to discuss ideas with you.
> 
> Hmm, we almost need a
> "operating-system-general-discussion-and-theory-that-doesnt-really-amount-to
> -terribly-much-but-has-some-really-fascinating-ideas" mailing list :) 
> 
> Post your ideas, they sound fascinating.  apparently the Vax have some
> scheme where you can place "alarms" on certain files for when they are
> accessed. (for example the shadow password file... someone reads it who
> isn't in the "your allowed" catagory mails root, and runs shutdown -h now"
> :)
Also a quota feature would be nice - not based on UID/GID but rather on 
file's associated attributes. A great thing for "flexible" swapfiles, 
database "trashcans" etc. 
==================================================
Stand straight, look me in the eye and say goodbye
Stand straight, we drifted past the point of
  reasons why.
Yesterday starts tommorow, tommorow starts today
And the problems seem to be we're picking up the
  pieces of a ricochet...

- Raw text -