Mail Archives: opendos/1997/04/21/04:30:46
Once upon a time (on 19 Apr 97 at 12:55) Lorier said:
> >> What are they currently? And how different is NASM? the difference of
> >> AT&T -> Intel? or is it just formatting? :)
> >OD sources use TASM (several versions), RASM (an internal DRI assembler)
> >and MASM (also several versions). All Intel syntax.
>
> They didn't get the rights to RASM perhaps? Hmm... Ah well, possibly write a
> TASM klone and port everything to that :)
;-)) I've just discovered another NASM limitation. It does not produce debug
information, nor line information nor source file information in the
generated .obj file. I use Soft-Ice for debugging and need the .map files to
contain that exact information: source file and lines. Does anyone have
OMF .obj format handy? I would then patch NASM to output such information.
For know I have created a set of DJGPP CPP macros to enable generation of
source compatible with TASM and NASM. I compile under TASM for debugging and
under NASM for release ;-))
==================================================
Stand straight, look me in the eye and say goodbye
Stand straight, we drifted past the point of
reasons why.
Yesterday starts tommorow, tommorow starts today
And the problems seem to be we're picking up the
pieces of a ricochet...
- Raw text -