Message-Id:	<199704210823.KAA20462@math.amu.edu.pl>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <grendel@[150.254.113.14]>
From:	"Mark Habersack" <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization:	PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins)
To:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 1997 10:24:21 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: Usage of directory entries
Reply-to:	grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC:	opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<AAeE_LpW27@mpak.convey.ru>

Once upon a time (on 19 Apr 97 at 1:20) -= ArkanoiD =- said:

> > > btw gcc requires 32-bit machine to run but it *can* produce 16-bit or
> > > even 8-bit code - so why djgpp can not?
> > GCC as such *cannot* produce 16-bit code. Only on linux you have 16-bit
> > tools (assembler and linker). No version of gcc produces 16-bit code.
> 
> gcc cross-compiler for pdp-11 that runs on VAX.
> i think it is not the only one.
;-)) That's a little exotic, isn't it? ;-)
==================================================
Stand straight, look me in the eye and say goodbye
Stand straight, we drifted past the point of
  reasons why.
Yesterday starts tommorow, tommorow starts today
And the problems seem to be we're picking up the
  pieces of a ricochet...

- Raw text -