To:	grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
Cc:	opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT BSI DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 970418161452 DOT 23833D-100000 AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Message-Id:	<AAeE_LpW27@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization:	International Brownian Movement
From:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date:	Sat, 19 Apr 97 01:20:24 +0300
Subject:	Re: Usage of directory entries
Lines:	27
MIME-Version:	1.0

nuqneH,

> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 16:15:36 +0200 (MET DST)
> From: Mark Habersack <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
> Reply-To: grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
> To: -= ArkanoiD =- <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
> cc: pp AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
>
> On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, -= ArkanoiD =- wrote:
>
> > > And from what I've heard, the OpenDOS sources needs a gazillion compilers
> > > to build... Yes, definitely, we'd need some standard free compilers! I
> > > don't know of good 16-bit C compilers for free (in the GPL sense),
> >
> > btw gcc requires 32-bit machine to run but it *can* produce 16-bit or even
> > 8-bit code - so why djgpp can not?
> GCC as such *cannot* produce 16-bit code. Only on linux you have 16-bit tools
> (assembler and linker). No version of gcc produces 16-bit code.

gcc cross-compiler for pdp-11 that runs on VAX.
i think it is not the only one.

--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|

- Raw text -