Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 1997 20:16:48 +0200 (MET DST)
From:	Mark Habersack <grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Reply-To:	grendel AT hoth DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
To:	Lorier <lorier AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>
cc:	pierre AT tycho DOT com, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Usage of directory entries
In-Reply-To:	<m0wIAOP-000Fm3C@hn.planet.gen.nz>
Message-ID:	<Pine.BSI.3.96.970418201548.29763F-100000@hoth.amu.edu.pl>
Organization:	PPP (Pesticide Powered Pumpkins)
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Fri, 18 Apr 1997, Lorier wrote:

> >don't know of good 16-bit C compilers for free (in the GPL sense), but for
> >assembler we could use NASM like Mark is already doing. One of the first
> >thing that should be done when the OpenDOS sources are done would be to
> >convert all the assembler sources we can find to NASM. Whew! Most of the
> >DOS internals are in asm, so I guess there is a lot of code to translate!
> 
> What are they currently?  And how different is NASM? the difference of AT&T
> -> Intel? or is it just formatting? :)
OD sources use TASM (several versions), RASM (an internal DRI assembler) and
MASM (also several versions). All Intel syntax.

- Raw text -