Message-Id:	<m0wIAPO-000FmFC@hn.planet.gen.nz>
Date:	Fri, 18 Apr 97 21:56 NZST
Mime-Version:	1.0
To:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
From:	Lorier <lorier AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>
Subject:	Re: Usage of directory entries
Cc:	opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com

At 01:09 AM 18/04/97 +0300, -= ArkanoiD =- wrote:
>nuqneH,
>
>> From: Lorier <lorier AT ihug DOT co DOT nz>
>> Subject: Re: Usage of directory entries
>> Cc: pierre AT tycho DOT com, opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
>[dd]
>> >> Would extremely interesting! Both LFN and symlinks!
>> >That's the idea!
>>
>> I think that we should just do ext2 (But I'm subtly biased).  Leave FAT for
>> dead (and Microsoft) :)
>
>I'm afraid ext2fs consumes too much RAM when accessed.. But it is ok as
>optional fs..

Does it? Hmm, thats a pity :)  We can't just shove it into EMS or so?
(Personally I think most of the OS should be stored above 640 as possible now)

- Raw text -