To:	pp AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca
Cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970412233459 DOT 23176A-100000 AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca>
Message-Id:	<AAJmAKpW27@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization:	International Brownian Movement
From:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date:	Sun, 13 Apr 97 12:49:07 +0300
Subject:	Re: 1 question about the future of OpenDos
Lines:	21
MIME-Version:	1.0

nuqneH,

> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 1997 23:37:22 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Pierre Phaneuf <pp AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca>
> Reply-To: pierre AT tycho DOT com
> cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: 1 question about the future of OpenDos
[dd]
>
> > Already *does* look good? You mean taskmgr? Or future oDOS-CDOS merge -
> > if it happens?
>
> If CDOS means FreeDOS (using the former C-DOS kernel), then no, it isn't
> supposed to merge...

No i mean DRi Concurrent DOS of course..

--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|

- Raw text -