delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
To: | mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca |
Cc: | opendos AT delorie DOT com |
References: | <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970412020752 DOT 309T-100000 AT capslock DOT com> |
Message-Id: | <AAUr1Kpe27@mpak.convey.ru> |
Organization: | International Brownian Movement |
From: | "-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru> |
Date: | Sun, 13 Apr 97 02:40:14 +0300 |
Subject: | Re: 1 question about the future of OpenDos |
Lines: | 23 |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
nuqneH, > From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca> > X-Sender: root AT capslock DOT com > Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca> > To: Laurent Dei-Cas <ldeicas AT reporters DOT net> > cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com > Subject: Re: 1 question about the future of OpenDos [dd] > > I think that OpenDOS is something that has been needed for a long > time. Multitasking under DOS (Desqview/Topview/Windows/etc) has > never been what it should be, and the OD multitasking looks good > so far, it still has a way to go though. > Already *does* look good? You mean taskmgr? Or future oDOS-CDOS merge - if it happens? --- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Must be a visit from the dead.. _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_ CU in Hell .......... Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_|
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |