To:	pp AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca
Cc:	opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970410172835 DOT 317A-100000 AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca>
Message-Id:	<AAgTOJpW27@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization:	International Brownian Movement
From:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 97 03:35:54 +0300
Subject:	Re: The compiling tools
Lines:	29
MIME-Version:	1.0

nuqneH,

> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 1997 17:32:49 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Pierre Phaneuf <pp AT 55-174 DOT hy DOT cgocable DOT ca>
> Reply-To: pierre AT tycho DOT com
> To: "Alaric B. Williams" <alaric AT abwillms DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
> cc: opendos-developer AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: The compiling tools
[dd]

> > I currently hate Unix, but the Linux kernel's not bad as they go!
>
> You hate Unix? Hmm... You'd hate what I did to my DOS! ;-)) Using bash as
> default shell, using Emacs, and so on... :-)

Do you have bash for _DOS_? Where can i get it? I've seen one for Sux'95,
and for Mustdie NT but i could not get one for DOS.. I have psh,a couple of
not-very-cshellish csh's and ksh-style thing named ms-sh. Only unixlike
shell for DOS i do not have and i know it exists (and i'd like to get it!) is
MKS toolkit one.

btw i even do have /dev directory - and i still can't guess which library
(i have my GNU tools compiled with it) recognizes files with one of undoc
attribute bits set as character devices ;)

--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|

- Raw text -