Date:	Thu, 03 Apr 97 16:55:16
From:	Scott_Mendelsohn AT arken DOT arkenstone DOT org
Message-Id:	<9703038601.AA860115316@arken.arkenstone.org>
To:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To:	OpenDOS discussion list <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
cc:	ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru, MPAUL AT ibh DOT rwth-aachen DOT de
Subject:	Re: Interactive shells Re: 32bit BIOS
Subject:	cc:Mail UUCPLINK 2.0 Undeliverable Message

User arken!jason is not defined
           Original text follows 
-----------------------------------------
Received: by ccmail
Received:  from nanospace by arkenstone.org (UUPC/extended 1.11) with UUCP;
           Thu, 03 Apr 1997 16:34:37 PST
Received: from surf.pangea.ca ([204.112.101.109]) by ts2.nanospace.com
	 with smtp (ident root using rfc1413) id <m0wCswo-000z7vC AT ts2 DOT nanospace DOT com>
	(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.37); Thu, 3 Apr 97 12:17 PST
Received: from delorie.com (delorie.com [199.125.93.1])
	by surf.pangea.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA04164
	for <jfayre AT pangea DOT ca>; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 14:15:32 -0600 (CST)
Received: by delorie.com (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	for opendos-list id OAA13843; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 14:31:22 -0500
Received: from mail.ican.net by delorie.com via ESMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
	for <opendos AT delorie DOT com> id OAA13839; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 14:31:19 -0500
Received: from capslock.com (root AT ppp-015 DOT sault-01 DOT ican DOT net [206.248.78.15])
          by mail.ican.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP
	  id OAA08569; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 14:27:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (root AT localhost) by capslock.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA11536; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 14:28:24 -0500
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 14:28:24 -0500 (EST)
From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
X-ccAdmin: postmaster AT nanospace
X-Sender: root AT capslock DOT com
Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To: OpenDOS discussion list <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
cc: ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru, MPAUL AT ibh DOT rwth-aachen DOT de
Subject: Re: Interactive shells Re: 32bit BIOS
Message-ID: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970403142719 DOT 6395O-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Organization: Total disorganization.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 25 Mar 1997, -= ArkanoiD =- wrote:

> I hope so. (it won't). I just don't want it to be mandatory - i am afraid
> of that because NC 5.0 is big and ugly. And - being compared to other shells
> it *does* cost memory,speed,etc..
>
> > I must admit, it would be slow if for maximum compatibility using
> > we'd use the original 3rd party archivers, but, of course, we could
> > write specialized programs for common archivers like ZIP/ARJ/RAR/LHA.
>
> TGZ! Don't forget .tar.gz archives! It _is_ common archiver!

I have yet to see any major software, commercial or otherwise, or
even any shareware software, freeware or public domain software
released using TGZ in DOS.  I'm sure that somewhere out there is
an example program that exists for the sole purpose of proving me
wrong, however it fails miserably at doing so because this is the
real world and we know that NO-ONE distributes programs for DOS
using TGZ.  No sane person anyway.  Besides when is the last time
you saw a DOS filename with two dots ('.') in the filename?  :o)



Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |                  Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

LINUX: The ONLY bulletproof 32-bit operating system that has it all.

- Raw text -