To:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970403142719 DOT 6395O-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Message-Id:	<AAi-4HpW27@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization:	International Brownian Movement
From:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date:	Fri, 4 Apr 97 03:47:40 +0300
Subject:	Re: Interactive shells Re: 32bit BIOS
Lines:	27
MIME-Version:	1.0

nuqneH,

> Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 14:28:24 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
> X-Sender: root AT capslock DOT com
> Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
> To: OpenDOS discussion list <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
> cc: ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru, MPAUL AT ibh DOT rwth-aachen DOT de
> Subject: Re: Interactive shells Re: 32bit BIOS
[dd]
> >
> > TGZ! Don't forget .tar.gz archives! It _is_ common archiver!
>
> I have yet to see any major software, commercial or otherwise, or
> even any shareware software, freeware or public domain software
> released using TGZ in DOS.  I'm sure that somewhere out there is
> an example program that exists for the sole purpose of proving me
> wrong, however it fails miserably at doing so because this is the
> real world and we know that NO-ONE distributes programs for DOS
> using TGZ.  No sane person anyway.

That's not true. Counter-examples are Ghostscript,perl and some other GNU
utilities for DOS. Widespread enough.
--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|

- Raw text -