Mail Archives: opendos/1997/04/03/13:45:02
User arken!jason is not defined
Original text follows
-----------------------------------------
Received: by ccmail
Received: from nanospace by arkenstone.org (UUPC/extended 1.11) with UUCP;
Thu, 03 Apr 1997 10:39:29 PST
Received: from surf.pangea.ca ([204.112.101.109]) by ts2.nanospace.com
with smtp (ident root using rfc1413) id <m0wCr4Q-000z6BC AT ts2 DOT nanospace DOT com>
(Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.37); Thu, 3 Apr 97 10:17 PST
Received: from delorie.com (delorie.com [199.125.93.1])
by surf.pangea.ca (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA24212
for <jfayre AT pangea DOT ca>; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 12:15:23 -0600 (CST)
Received: by delorie.com (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
for opendos-list id MAA00864; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 12:18:03 -0500
Received: from blackwidow.saultc.on.ca by delorie.com via ESMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)
for <opendos AT delorie DOT com> id MAA00856; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 12:17:58 -0500
Received: from capslock.com (root AT ppp-015 DOT sault-01 DOT ican DOT net [206.248.78.15]) by blackwidow.saultc.on.ca (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA09143; Thu, 3 Apr 1997 13:23:01 -0600
Received: from localhost (root AT localhost) by capslock.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA02260; Wed, 2 Apr 1997 04:56:46 -0500
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 04:56:45 -0500 (EST)
From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
X-ccAdmin: postmaster AT nanospace
X-Sender: root AT capslock DOT com
Reply-To: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To: Leath Muller <leathm AT solwarra DOT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au>
cc: OpenDOS discussion list <opendos AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [opendos] Wishlist 2.0
In-Reply-To: <199703311139 DOT VAA24061 AT solwarra DOT gbrmpa DOT gov DOT au>
Message-ID: <Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970402045242 DOT 1754N-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Organization: Total disorganization.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Mailing-List: opendos AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, Leath Muller wrote:
> > If so, I'm also PISSED OFF at them. I guess I *WONT*, let me
> > repeat that - *WONT* be playing ANY of their games in the future.
> > Even iD software supported LINUX for DOOM and QUAKE, as well as
> > ABUSE (crack.com)
>
> > I share that sentiment if what you say is true. What is your
> > source?
>
> id wont be supporting DOS anymore (check out john carmacks finger message
> johnc AT idsoftware DOT com), just as most other companies wont be supporting DOS
> anymore either. Its sad, but Windows has taken over, and I can't think of
> any easier way myself to write fast hardware accelerated graphics code than
> using Windows... I prefer DOS to Windows anyday, but its now a thing quickly
> passing us by and dying on the big corporate front... :(
Well, id won't be seeing any of my deniros then. Neither will
any other company that goes to winxx only stuff. I guess now
I'll have plenty of time to solve all of the games that I've
acquired but haven't had time to play. (XWING, Tiefighter, Xcom,
Pandora Directive, .....)
Where in any of Blizzard's latest games (for W95) is there any
code which requires hardware acceleration? Or any W95 specific
things for that matter? Oh well, WC2 and Dark Portal will give
many many months of gameplay yet.
Mike A. Harris | http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant | Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
- Raw text -