Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 1997 10:30:50 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
Reply-To:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To:	yeep <yeep AT xs4all DOT nl>
cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: running opendos with win 95
In-Reply-To:	<199703271814.TAA00012@magigimmix.xs4all.nl>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970328103024.7284I-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Total disorganization.
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 27 Mar 1997, yeep wrote:

> > > That would explain why you can't get LFN while you boot MS-DOS only.
> > > If LFN is truly just a Win95 driver, than I think letting Win95 run of
> OD
> > > can't be that hard, becuase of LFN is done by Win95 itself, then why
> > > wouldn't other things be done by Win95 as well.
> > 
> > This is a very good point you've raised Yeep.  I guess now we
> > find out exactly how closely tied 95 is to MSDOS eh?  I still
> > look at W95/DOS7 as a DOS7/Win4.0 combo and not as M$ wants us to
> > believe.  If you look at the MBR of a drive with 95 on it, it
> > shows the text "MS-WIN 4.1" or something like that.  Hmmm....
> 
> Hah!
> Run MSD en look at your DOS version!

MSD?  I deleted MSD.  My DOS version is 6.22.

Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |                  Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

4DOS is a very powerful COMMAND.COM replacement with over 80 commands!

- Raw text -