To:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Cc:	opendos AT delorie DOT com
References:	<Pine DOT LNX DOT 3 DOT 95 DOT 970327121505 DOT 186N-100000 AT capslock DOT com>
Message-Id:	<ABGJlEpG-6@mpak.convey.ru>
Organization:	International Brownian Movement
From:	"-= ArkanoiD =-" <ark AT mpak DOT convey DOT ru>
Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 97 01:29:36 +0300
Subject:	Re: [opendos] OpenDOS Startup logo [brannanp]
Lines:	22
MIME-Version:	1.0

nuqneH,

> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 1997 12:18:12 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
> To: Dean Dancey <dtwo AT sympatico DOT ca>
> cc: opendos AT delorie DOT com
> Subject: Re: [opendos] OpenDOS Startup logo [brannanp]
[dd]
>
> On a less serious note, I think that due to several serious bugs
> that have been found in EMM386, and other programs that come with
> OD, it is best to stick to 6.22 until the next OD release.  I

Why that [censored] 6.22? Why people do like 6.22 so much? I can't figure out
what can force someone to change 5.0 or PC-DOS 7.0 to 6.22.. But everyone
around here uses 6.22!
I'd prefer 5.0 or PC DOS 7.0,but *not* MS 6.22

--- 
                                       _     _  _  _  _      _  _
   Must be a visit from the dead..     _| o |_ | | _|| |   / _||_|   |_ |_ |_
   CU in Hell ..........  Arkan#iD    |_  o  _||_| _||_| /   _|  | o |_||_||_|

- Raw text -