Date:	Sun, 23 Mar 1997 09:04:59 -0500 (EST)
From:	"..Nissim.." <nchudnof AT mbhs DOT edu>
To:	OpenDOS <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [opendos] FSSTND
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970322224726.224E-100000@capslock.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970323090244.24492A-100000@binx.mbhs.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Sat, 22 Mar 1997, Mike A. Harris wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, Tim Bird wrote:
> 
> > > Again, since the standard would ONLY BE A RECOMMENDATION, other
> > > users would NOT have to abide by it anyways.  Those who did
> > > however would benefit greatly by the features of the standard.
> > 
> > Mike has hit the nail on the head here.  If this is on the wishlist,
> > it should be separated into 2 parts: a file system standard, and
> > a "smart installer" facility.  Both would be applicable not only
> > to OpenDOS, but also to MSDOS systems.  The smart installer could
> [BIG SNIPPAGE]
> 
> The way that you just described the 2 parts is exactly how I
> envision it.  The redhat package manager is very much the type of
> thing that is needed.  If and when the smart installer is made,
> it should definately use a DOSish archive format though.  I
> recommend ZIP by default, but ANY archiver should be able to
> work.  In other words, the smart installer should understand RAR,
> ARJ, TGZ, ZOO, UC2, EXE self extractors, etc...  it should be

That could be easy to do..just build a core installer, and have it load a
DLM for the different formats..so when new ones come out, no need to
re-compile installer


...Nissim...
**** GUI? FUI! DOS prompt forever! ****
OpenDOS: Free, multitasking DOS-    http://www.caldera.com/dos/
DJGPP: Free 32-bit DPMI C compiler- http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/

- Raw text -