To:	opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Subject:	Re: [opendos] Wishlist v2.0
Message-ID:	<19970321.194200.4631.12.chambersb@juno.com>
References:	<199703202200 DOT RAA09813 AT keeper DOT albany DOT net>
From:	chambersb AT juno DOT com (Benjamin D Chambers)
Date:	Fri, 21 Mar 1997 22:36:56 EST

On Thu, 20 Mar 1997 16:57:49 -0500 "James Lefavour"
<jamesl AT mail DOT albany DOT net> writes:
>And, we could develop the 16-bit OD in the same direction, with a GUI 
>layer (for those who want it) that could (maybe?) handle the win3.1 
>programs (on appropriate hardware). Anybody? For everyone, the 
>command line would always be available, and all features of the OS 
>would be available from it (except the GUI specific ones, that is).

I would suggest that either:
a)	We either have two separate versions, ie OD16 and OD32, which
are developed independently, or,
b)	Whatever changes are made are made simultaneously to both
versions, preferably in the OD16 first to make sure it's compatible.

>If the interface (GUI) is customizable enough, we could even (easily) 
>win over the W95/W97 users! As if that would be difficult <g>

Unfortunately, it would be difficult.  In my experience, people who use
Win95 either don't know enough to use a better system or are hard-core MS
fanatics who'd love to lick Bill's (Gates) *ss, or both :(

...Chambers

- Raw text -