Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 1997 01:24:54 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
Reply-To:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To:	Matt Adam <sylphid AT infomatch DOT com>
cc:	opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Subject:	Re: What good is GEM?
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.BSI.3.95.970318091633.2818A-100000@infomatch.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970320012303.12128c-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Total disorganization.
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Tue, 18 Mar 1997, Matt Adam wrote:

> > What good, exactly, is GEM?  What apps will it run,
> > and otherwise what advantage(s) does it provide?
> > 
> 
> for us people that have a working knowledge of command-line processors
> (and feel comfortable using one), the advantages are probably very slim.
> however, if we want to actually take a bite into the poplar computing
> market, a GUI is a necessity.  most people have no clue how to use a
> commandline processor, and they don't want to learn.

That is a very sad truth.  Even though it is sad, (and true) GEM
will have to be at least as capable as windows (that sounds
really funny!) to be very useful.  I suspect that this will come
to pass from the sounds of it though.

Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |                  Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

URL of the day: http://www.digital.com

- Raw text -