Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 1997 07:27:10 -0500 (EST)
From:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
Reply-To:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
To:	jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com
cc:	evand AT scn DOT org, OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [opendos] FSSTND
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.NXT.3.95.970314225615.16736P-100000@eagle1>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970320072520.12128J-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Total disorganization.
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Fri, 14 Mar 1997 jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com wrote:

> That would work, except that tags are not to indicate anything other
> than type.
> That's why [os:opendos] [os:linux].
> Now, [os:app:linux] would work.
> On Fri, 14 Mar 1997, Evan Dickinson
> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 14 Mar 1997 jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com wrote:
> > 
> > > should probably be [os-opendos] [os-linux]
> > > type tags in paths.dir file too.
> > 
> > How about something like this:
> > 
> > [opendos:app]
> > c:\dosapp
> > 
> > [linux:app]
> > /usr/bin

I'm having great difficulty understanding why and/or how Linux
has any place in an OpenDOS standard.  Am I the only one?  Or has
someone written a magical "LinuxEMU" for OpenDOS?  And you have
to install your Linux apps into FAT drives and put a path into
the OPENDOS PATH file? 

Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |                  Coming soon: dynamic-IP-freedom...
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

RHIDE: Current version 1.10

- Raw text -