From:	jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com
Date:	Fri, 14 Mar 1997 02:01:45 -0500 (EST)
To:	"Mike A. Harris" <mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca>
Cc:	evand AT scn DOT org, OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [opendos] FSSTND
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970313210715.955S-100000@capslock.com>
Message-Id:	<Pine.NXT.3.95.970314015609.6456y-100000@eagle1>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

Why not:

[utility]
c:\utility
d:\utils
[apps]
c:\dos\apps
[game]
c:\games

This has the advantage of making path additions similar to the way
they look under dos directory structure.
If a new application were to be installed, it should have a util-type
tag available for the paths.dir file.
All paths created on a machine could be documented in paths.dir with a
[misc]
tag for those without a defineable type.
Then with these fast directory changing utilities, moving into
paths even with five directories dep would be lots easier.



jude <jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com>

- Raw text -