delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com |
Date: | Wed, 12 Mar 1997 23:29:52 -0500 (EST) |
To: | Paul W Brannan <brannanp AT musc DOT edu> |
Cc: | Filipe Custsdio <fmc AT novabase DOT pt>, |
OpenDOS mailing list <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net> | |
Subject: | Re: [opendos] BAD Filesystems |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.ULT.3.95.970312161954.728B-100000@atrium.musc.edu> |
Message-Id: | <Pine.NXT.3.95.970312232455.12374C-100000@eagle1> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Sender: | owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net |
I'm an advocate of text files whenever possible, only caution I'd add to this is that a data base format checker and repair utility would be nice for especially the newer users so it could clean up after one of their edits if necessary. Actually the structure of apps.dat could be normalized to: app name, library number. Once this was done you'd have the record for an app appear more than once in apps.dat for each lib it used. This would eliminate the variable length records in apps.dat and give the clasic one-to-many relationship to the data bases. jude <jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com>
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |