Message-Id:	<199703101228.GAA01512@sound.net.>
Date:	Mon, 10 Mar 1997 06:30:21 -0600
From:	"Jonathan E. Brickman" <brickman AT cjnetworks DOT com>
Reply-To:	"Jonathan E. Brickman" <brickman AT cjnetworks DOT com>
To:	opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Subject:	[opendos] FSSTND
Mime-Version:	1.0
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

I disagree about using FSSTND as a standard for OpenDOS.
FSSTND was designed as a good structure for a Unix.
OpenDOS is a DOS, well-suited for constructing single-user
workstations, not servers.  FSSTND implies a huge directory
hierarchy that I don't see the need for under DOS.
I also don't see applications support as a valid reason
for using FSSTND: Makefiles are almost always quite
easily reconfigurable for non-Unix directory structures,
and super-long paths need to be first on the list of OpenDOS
improvements if they are not already available.

- Raw text -