From:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 1997 12:30:30 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
To:	Kurt Weiske <pfortran AT crl DOT com>
cc:	Richard Hoskins <rmh AT interlaced DOT net>, opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net
Subject:	Re: [opendos] BAD Filesystems
In-Reply-To:	<2.2.32.19970224142754.006a454c@mail.crl.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970225122835.597H-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Total disorganization.
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

On Mon, 24 Feb 1997, Kurt Weiske wrote:

> At 12:15 AM 2/24/97 -0500, Richard Hoskins wrote:
> >Kurt Weiske <pfortran AT crl DOT com> writes:
> >
> >> >> While we are there, why not make bash the default command interpreter for
> >> >> OpenDOS?  (Can we add this to the wish list?)
>  
> >> >Why not just use Linux?:)
>  
> >> Sure - make it run on the 286 in my garage currently running OpenDOS.
> 
> >Minix is now free.
> 
> What does that have to do with Linux? Or OpenDOS? :)

What it has to do with Linux, is that he said he had a 286.
Linux doesn't run on less than a 386 *YET*.  Minix runs on a 286,
so therefore since it is now alledgedly free, and since Linux was
originally based on Minix, that makes it a possible candidate for
his 286.  


Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |    My webpage has moved and my address has changed.
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT  DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

Question: Does anyone know how to get talk to work in Linux?

- Raw text -