From:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Date:	Tue, 25 Feb 1997 12:37:21 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
To:	James Fudge <jfudge AT adams DOT berk DOT net>
cc:	OpenDOS discussion list <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [opendos] BAD Filesystems
In-Reply-To:	<199702250002.TAA10317@adams.berk.net>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970225123248.597I-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Total disorganization.
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

On Mon, 24 Feb 1997, James Fudge wrote:

> > >>> >Why not just use Linux?:)
> > > 
> > >>> Sure - make it run on the 286 in my garage currently running 
> > >OpenDOS.
> > >
> > >>Minix is now free.
> > >
> > >What does that have to do with Linux? Or OpenDOS? :)
> > >
> > Not a helluvalot, but it doe usefully 
> > point out a workable, non-DOS alternative 
> > for pre-386 PCs -- with a bit of effort, 
> > Minix will even run on an XT clone
> 
> if wanna use bash i'll use linux or win95

bash is available for DOS allready.  It is a 32 bit DJGPP port in
the DJGPP dir of any DJGPP mirror.

> not that bash is bad... 

No, not at all.  Wouldn't want it as my primary shell in DOS
though.  (Wouldn't want COMMAND.COM as my primary shell in Linux
in retrospect either though)


> as for minix - it was the very first file system for linux was it not 

Minix is a UNIX operating system that would run on 286's and
possibly even 8088's if I'm not mistaken.  It had its own
filesystem as well. Linux was originally designed (in Linus's own
words) to "be a better Minix than Minix".


Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |    My webpage has moved and my address has changed.
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

LINUX: What changed from 2.0.27 to 2.0.28?  I don't notice anything.

- Raw text -