From:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 1997 04:07:18 -0500 (EST)
Reply-To:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca
To:	Bjorn DOT Simonsen AT student DOT uib DOT no
cc:	opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net, webmaster AT caldera DOT com
Subject:	Re: [opendos] Another access disablement?
In-Reply-To:	<199702051042.LAA29300@taxus.uib.no>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.3.95.970210040216.285L-100000@capslock.com>
Organization:	Total disorganization.
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

On Wed, 5 Feb 1997 Bjorn DOT Simonsen AT student DOT uib DOT no wrote:

> ** When complete the Documentation will be downloadable in Corel Envoy
> format from this page.** 
> 
> Corel Envoy format??? uh!? Should I be EnVIOus? In the light of recent
> learn a trick or two, they can find some pretty good advice at: 
> 
>  http://www.gsa.gov/coca/WWWcode.htm
> 
> which points to the following document  : 
> Writing Accessible HTML Documents, 

Yeah, what is Corel Envoy format?  Might as well be Commodore-64
Bank Street Writer format.  Either way it's useless to me (and
99% of everyone else using OpenDOS).  Funny that it should be
written in a Windows program.  Kinda like looking at my Canadian
English Dictionary published in the United States.  :o)

I think in retaliation that any work that I do in OpenDOS I will
do the documentation in LaTeX format, or as a manpage.  :o)


Mike A. Harris        |             http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris
Computer Consultant   |    My webpage has moved and my address has changed.
My dynamic address: http://blackwidow.saultc.on.ca/~mharris/ip-address.html
mailto:mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca

LINUX: What changed from 2.0.27 to 2.0.28?  I don't notice anything.

- Raw text -