delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: opendos/1997/02/06/09:04:29

Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 06:46:10 -0600 (MDT)
From: Roger Ivie <IVIE AT cc DOT usu DOT edu>
Subject: [opendos] COMMAND.COM enhancement
To: OPENDOS AT MAIL DOT TACOMA DOT NET
Message-id: <01IF34DWTGTE8ZOP0K@cc.usu.edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
Sender: owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

OK, I've been thinking about it and I finally have my objections to modifying
COMMAND.COM so that it does direct screen writes down to a few simple
statements. Here goes:

Why is it that when we're speaking of Linux, it's A Good Thing to have
device independence, yet when we're speaking of DOS it's suddenly A Good Thing
for every program to lug around half a dozen video drivers?

If you want to improve the performance of OpenDOS screen writes, put the
improvement where it belongs: in the console device driver.

Roger Ivie
ivie AT cc DOT usu DOT edu

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019