Message-Id:	<199702042226.XAA29605@math.amu.edu.pl>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
From:	"Mark Habersack" <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization:	What? (Poznan, Poland)
To:	"Colin W. Glenn" <cwg01 AT gnofn DOT org>
Date:	Tue, 4 Feb 1997 23:25:46 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32?
Reply-to:	grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca, dg AT dcs DOT st-and DOT ac DOT uk,
	OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
References:	<199702040034 DOT BAA19033 AT math DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
In-reply-to:	<Pine.GSO.3.95.970203230110.6130C-100000@sparkie.gnofn.org>
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

Once upon a time (on  3 Feb 97 at 23:05) Colin W. Glenn said:


> > Sure, but we *must* know what we can do, what makes sense to take upon -
> > doubling somebody else's work is sensless - we can use that energy for
> > anything else.
> 
> And this list here is a good example, we're already talking about
> modifications to the source, we can get more refined and subdivide into
> topical arena's which deal with a specific subject of the ENTIRE OS.
All this will succeed only if Caldera will take part in the discussion and 
lead us a little throughout they realm.

> Example:
> 
> [opendos.command.com] What's with section 12?
> 
> Hmmm?
> 
> [opendos.multiboot.sys]
> [opendos.LFN.support]
> [opendos.other.ideas.welcome]
> [opendos.colin.glenn]
I think it's a good idea. Gene? But I suggest this (and other similar) thread 
rather be moved to the opendos-developer.

---------- Visit http://ananke.amu.edu.pl/~grendel ------------
You're just a waste of time, you're just a babbling face, you're
just three sick holes that run like sores, you're fucking waste
you're like a slug on the floor, oh you're usless and ugly and
useless and ugly, and shiver and shake when I think of how you
make me hate.

- Raw text -