Message-Id:	<199702042140.WAA16165@math.amu.edu.pl>
Comments:	Authenticated sender is <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
From:	"Mark Habersack" <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
Organization:	What? (Poznan, Poland)
To:	chambersb AT juno DOT com (Benjamin D Chambers)
Date:	Tue, 4 Feb 1997 22:39:28 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32?
Reply-to:	grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl
CC:	OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
In-reply-to:	<19970203.183342.4575.0.chambersb@juno.com>
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

Once upon a time (on  3 Feb 97 at 21:32) Benjamin D Chambers said:

> On Sun, 2 Feb 1997 20:39:40 +0100 "Mark Habersack"
> <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl> writes:
> >Once upon a time (on  2 Feb 97 at 0:18) jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com 
> >said:
> >
> >> Why not make the fat 32 an I.F.S?  Then this way if it's
> >> supplied users can decide which way they'd like to go.
> >Coz there's no documentation of IFS interface. Besides it's an M$ 
> >standard 
> >and, as such, is being kept secret ;-)). I'd vote for developing an 
> >OpenDOS-specific format of such an installable FS driver (and one that can
> >be dynamically loaded/unloaded without all that black magic needed to
> >remove an installed SYS driver on DOS)
> You mean... DOG LET'S YOU REMOVE A .SYS DRIVER??????
> Who'd of guessed???  I thought M$'s policy was "It worked for you
> yesterday - if you don't want it there anymore/it's not working anymore,
> then YOU're the one that has a bug, cause OUR stuff is great!"
Oh yes, it does allow you to do that. Only you have to dig deep down in the 
innards of our beloved M$-DOG.

********************************************************
For when it comes down to it there's no use trying to
  pretend. For when it comes down to there's no one really
left to blame - blame it on me, you can blame it on me
We're just sugar mice on the rain.
----
Visit http://ananke.amu.edu.pl/~grendel

- Raw text -