Date:	Mon, 3 Feb 1997 23:05:46 -0600 (CST)
From:	"Colin W. Glenn" <cwg01 AT gnofn DOT org>
To:	Mark Habersack <grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl>
cc:	mharris AT blackwidow DOT saultc DOT on DOT ca, dg AT dcs DOT st-and DOT ac DOT uk,
	OpenDOS Mailing List <opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net>
Subject:	Re: [opendos] OpenDOS + Win95 w/FAT32?
In-Reply-To:	<199702040034.BAA19033@math.amu.edu.pl>
Message-ID:	<Pine.GSO.3.95.970203230110.6130C-100000@sparkie.gnofn.org>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Sender:	owner-opendos AT mail DOT tacoma DOT net

On Tue, 4 Feb 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:
> > I would think that once they've released the sources, there will be
> > extensive support for those rewriting them, as well as provision for
> > submitting modified source for approval to be distributed.  In better
> > words, Caldera maintains control over the improvement process, preventing
> > ten thousand different OpenDOS's from sprouting like wild grass.

> Sure, but we *must* know what we can do, what makes sense to take upon - 
> doubling somebody else's work is sensless - we can use that energy for 
> anything else.

And this list here is a good example, we're already talking about
modifications to the source, we can get more refined and subdivide into
topical arena's which deal with a specific subject of the ENTIRE OS.

Example:

[opendos.command.com] What's with section 12?

Hmmm?

[opendos.multiboot.sys]
[opendos.LFN.support]
[opendos.other.ideas.welcome]
[opendos.colin.glenn]

- Raw text -