Mail Archives: opendos/1997/02/04/00:38:09
On Tue, 4 Feb 1997, Mark Habersack wrote:
> > I would think that once they've released the sources, there will be
> > extensive support for those rewriting them, as well as provision for
> > submitting modified source for approval to be distributed. In better
> > words, Caldera maintains control over the improvement process, preventing
> > ten thousand different OpenDOS's from sprouting like wild grass.
> Sure, but we *must* know what we can do, what makes sense to take upon -
> doubling somebody else's work is sensless - we can use that energy for
> anything else.
And this list here is a good example, we're already talking about
modifications to the source, we can get more refined and subdivide into
topical arena's which deal with a specific subject of the ENTIRE OS.
Example:
[opendos.command.com] What's with section 12?
Hmmm?
[opendos.multiboot.sys]
[opendos.LFN.support]
[opendos.other.ideas.welcome]
[opendos.colin.glenn]
- Raw text -