Mail Archives: opendos/1997/02/03/21:51:30
On Sun, 2 Feb 1997 20:39:40 +0100 "Mark Habersack"
<grendel AT ananke DOT amu DOT edu DOT pl> writes:
>Once upon a time (on 2 Feb 97 at 0:18) jdashiel AT eagle1 DOT eaglenet DOT com
>said:
>
>> Why not make the fat 32 an I.F.S? Then this way if it's
>> supplied users can decide which way they'd like to go.
>Coz there's no documentation of IFS interface. Besides it's an M$
>standard
>and, as such, is being kept secret ;-)). I'd vote for developing an
>OpenDOS-specific format of such an installable FS driver (and one that
>can be
>dynamically loaded/unloaded without all that black magic needed to
>remove an
>installed SYS driver on DOS)
You mean... DOG LET'S YOU REMOVE A .SYS DRIVER??????
Who'd of guessed??? I thought M$'s policy was "It worked for you
yesterday - if you don't want it there anymore/it's not working anymore,
then YOU're the one that has a bug, cause OUR stuff is great!"
...Chambers
- Raw text -